79 pages • 2 hours read
Amy Ellis NuttA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Nutt begins this chapter by explaining how humans have long thought they could influence a newborn’s sex through various rituals. She then describes some of the biological processes that shape sex and gender. Humans have twenty-three pairs of chromosomes, the last of which make a person a genetic female (XX) or a genetic male (XY), but at least fifty genes play a role in the development of sexual identity. Plus, sexual anatomy and gender identity come from two different processes that happen at different times, along different neural pathways. Genes and hormones are involved in both of these processes, and there are numerous biological events that can cause a person to have a gender identity that differs from his or her sexual anatomy.
Hormones play a large role in determining a person’s sexual anatomy. Sex organs begin to form when an embryo is about six weeks old, but the brain-based processes that affect sex and gender are at least somewhat distinct. This includes the determination of gender identity. Part of the brain called the “straight gyrus” seems to affect how feminine a person is, no matter if this person is a male or a female, genetically speaking. The larger the straight gyrus, the more feminine the person tends to be.
Moreover, there are various combinations of genetic sex and sex organs. Some people with XY chromosomes have a mutation of the androgen receptor on the X chromosome that causes something called androgen insensitivity syndrome. Though these people are chromosomally male and have testes, they also have parts of the female anatomy, tend to appear female overall, and usually have a female gender identity. Other people have female chromosomes but male sex organs. Combinations of male and female organs are relatively common, and according to Nutt, “[a]s many as one in one hundred infants are born with sexual anatomy that differs in some way from standard male and female anatomy” (90-91).
In the past, babies with ambiguous genitalia were often assigned a gender that had more to do with cultural expectations than biology, Nutt argues: “Most [medical professionals] […] urged parents to decide on a sex for these babies immediately after birth, then hand the infants over to the surgeons to ‘correct’ the confusion” (91).
This sometimes had disastrous consequences. One example of such consequences involves a woman known by the pseudonym Cheryl Chase. Doctors were unsure if she had a small penis or a large clitoris when she was born. At first they assigned her a male identity. A short while later, they discovered she had a uterus and ovotestes, a hybrid of ovaries and testes. They told her parents to raise her as a girl and throw out any photos showing her as a boy. At age 8, without Chase’s knowledge, she had surgery to remove her testicular tissue. Two years later, her parents told her what was going on. She kept it a secret for years, graduated from MIT, and founded a tech company. Then she wrote an open letter to a scientific journal, requesting that people with similar intersex conditions join the Intersex Society of North America. Responses poured in, and Chase because a spokesperson for the fledgling organization. She urged doctors not to perform surgery on intersex babies’ genitalia. Instead, these children should decide which genitals they should have when they are old enough to do so, she explained. Chase also worked hard to normalize intersex conditions, insisting that they should not be “likened to being malformed or abnormal or freakish, and so surgical remedy should be the first thing doctors recommend” (92).
Chase and the Intersex Society opposed behaviorism, which had a heavy influence on psychology, psychiatry, and sexual politics in 1960s and ’70s. Dr. John Money, a prominent behaviorist, believed that gender identity is a social construct and that parents of children with ambiguous genitalia should choose which gender they wanted their child to be because the youngster would naturally adopt it. Dr. Money liked to show off a child he studied, Bruce, who was born in 1965. Bruce’s penis was burned off by accident, so Money convinced the parents that they should raise him as a girl and remove his testicles. This child, now called Brenda, was given female hormones during puberty. Despite the clothing, hormones, and breasts, she never felt female and was bullied relentlessly. Her parents finally told her truth and she started the road back to being a male at age 14. After a mastectomy, testosterone injections, and two penis reconstructions, Brenda, now known as David Reimer, committed suicide. Despite the suffering David endured, Money kept telling the public this case of sex reassignment was successful. When an academic paper exposed the truth about Reimer’s torture in 1997, and a book on the subject came out in 2000, the writings “did much to turn the focus on the nature versus nurture debate, at least as regards gender, back to the brain” (93). It is now widely accepted that gender is determined before birth.
Reimer’s case didn’t explain, however, why a person might have a gender identity that doesn’t match his or her sexual anatomy. Throughout much of the 20th century, people who changed sexes were viewed as abnormal—or worse. More recently, some academic institutions have started offering ways for students and others to classify themselves as nonbinary when it comes to gender. But this is still the exception rather than the norm. Nutt explains that cisgender people often dislike their bodies, but they do feel that their bodies belong to them. The experience is quite different for a transgender person. According to Nutt, every heartbeat comes with a denial of who they are. The only known way to bring the mind and body into harmony is sex reassignment surgery. Before the 21st century dawned, all sex reassignment surgeries were performed on full-grown adults, which presented some especially difficult challenges:
The deep-seated desire to look on the outside the way a person feels on the inside impels many transgender people to undergo sex reassignment surgery, but the psychological consequences of trying to transform a fully developed male into a female or vice versa can be devastating if the results do not meet a person’s expectations. And often they don’t (96).
One tragic example of results not meeting expectations is Los Angeles Times sports journalist Mike Penner, who became Christine Daniels in 2007. His public declaration of his sex change scratched a psychological itch, but that wasn’t enough to provide him with enduring fulfillment. People were cruel about Daniels’ appearance. Another journalist blogged that Daniels was unattractive, and that she essentially looked like a man in a dress. He added that “we’re all going along with someone’s dress-up role-playing” (98). Penner reverted back to his original gender identity but lost his wife and many of the other parts of his life that sustained him. He committed suicide in 2009.
Nutt explains how the desire to classify and categorize the masses grew as the population grew and urbanized in the 19th century. The categories created tended to serve the status quo and the interests of the people in charge. Classifications such as sex, class, religion, and trade made large groups of people easier to control, Nutt argues. If anything, classifications of gender identity became more rigid. Nutt says that gender classifications have been rigid throughout human history for other reasons as well, including “the creation of economies that depended on the division of labor, inheritance laws, [and] even religious rites” (100). Some people had to be women because the women were expected to cook, clean, and care for the children. Only certain duties were given to men.
Nutt shares several anecdotes of people posing as the opposite gender to gain power or something else of value. A few come from the world of athletics, such as a male high jumper the Nazis forced to compete as a woman in the 1936 Olympic Games. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) went on to institute genetic testing in 1968 but halted the practice in 1999 after realizing that “[n]o one test could confirm that someone was 100 percent male or 100 percent female” (101). At the 1996 Olympic Games, seven of the eight women who tested positive for male chromosomes were found to have androgen insensitivity syndrome, the aforementioned condition that causes some people who are genetically male to have female features, mostly female genitalia, and female identities.
While the National Collegiate Athletic Association now allows transgender athletes to compete once they’ve gone through sex reassignment surgery and had hormone therapy for a certain length of time, other athletic decision-makers continue to bar transgender athletes based on incorrect or outdated information. For example, a transgender woman sued CrossFit in 2014 after the organization rejected her application to compete in the women’s portion of its yearly strength competition. She’d had sex reassignment surgery eight years earlier and had been taking female hormones since, but the organization’s lawyer insisted that she would have a physical advantage over the other competitors. He even accused her of missing or ignoring basic science lessons in high school. According to Nutt, “[d]octors and scientists agree that after a year either on female hormones or male hormone suppressants, any competitive advantage a transgender athlete might have had initially is gone” (102).
Nutt concludes the chapter by noting that in 2007, there was only one endocrinologist in the U.S. who specialized in treating transgender children. He worked at the Boston Children’s Hospital, about sixty miles from Maine’s southern border.
Nutt introduces Dr. Norman Spack, the pediatric endocrinologist she mentioned at the end of Chapter 15. She explains how his volunteer work with an organization for homeless youth led him to his specialty. Many of the runaways he encountered were boys who dressed like girls or girls who dressed like boys. He also had a formative experience studying newts, and specifically how hormones could spark the process of metamorphosis in these creatures. These experiences taught him that identity—including sex and gender—is fluid. Nutt says, “The transgender teens [Spack] met during his volunteer work or the intersex individuals he met in his endocrinology practice were as much a part of nature as the lowly newt, and therefore not aberrations or mistakes” (105).
Dr. Spack’s first transgender patient, a Harvard student who was female and living as a man, underscored this point. The student wanted Dr. Spack to give him testosterone, but Spack only had experience treating children. He agreed to do the hormone treatment if the student agreed to teach him about being transgender. During this journey, Dr. Spack met Dr. Louis Gooren, a Dutch endocrinologist who was among the first medical professionals to treat transgender youth. Gooren had found a safe, effective way to suppress puberty long enough for these kids to undergo the psychological testing necessary to determine how deep-seated their gender dysphoria was. Delivering the appropriate hormones allowed the children’s bodies to develop in the direction their brains wanted them to go, gender-wise.
Dr. Spack went on to open a gender clinic at the Boston Children’s Hospital. In 2006, Wyatt becomes one of his first American transgender pediatric patients. The doctor puts Wyatt’s family at ease by highlighting a single point: that gender identity stems from the brain, and that many things can happen to a developing brain that change how a child will develop. He also explains that some kids who prefer to act and dress like the opposite gender aren’t truly transgender. Nutt adds that only a quarter of children who express themselves as the opposite gender keep that gender identity when puberty hits. Those who keep identifying as the other gender face significant trauma if they have to go through puberty in a body that feels like the wrong one. This is why Dr. Spack advises starting Wyatt on hormones when it looks like puberty is beginning for Jonas. Kelly feels relieved that they’ve found someone who understands Wyatt, someone the family can trust. Wayne gains confidence that letting Wyatt transition is the right thing to do, now that he has heard the opinion of a trustworthy expert. He’s still not convinced that Wyatt is transgender, but he’s willing to let Kelly proceed as if Wyatt is.
The part of the building with the fifth-grade classrooms has multi-stall girls’ and boys’ bathrooms, unlike the rest of the school, which has single-stall unisex bathrooms. Erhardt convinces Kelly that submitting a Section 504 form to the board of education would protect Wyatt because his gender dysphoria diagnosis qualifies him for the protections against discrimination students with disabilities receive. Kelly wants to make sure Wyatt is safe at school and that there are trustworthy people he can turn to if needed, so she agrees to move forward with the form. Wyatt, meanwhile, fears that other students will see his penis. Kelly and the school agree that Wyatt should use the girls’ bathroom.
When trying to find a girls’ softball team for Wyatt, Kelly calls different school systems in Maine and finds that they have nondiscrimination policies but that none address gender identity. She does a great deal of work to make sure the local Little League team would let him play, but they require him to wear a cup and athletic supporter. Dr. Holmes asks him why he’s so anxious and upset one day, and Wyatt says he doesn’t like that his softball uniform makes him feel different from the other players. He wants to feel normal. Dr. Holmes tells Wyatt that he is different. This surprises Wyatt, since Dr. Holmes usually goes along with what he is saying. She acknowledges that he has boy parts, which makes Wyatt uncomfortable. Then she tells him how she thinks it’s special that he knows who he—a girl—is, despite this physical evidence that he is a boy. Wyatt feels angry when he leaves the therapy session, but after a few minutes, he returns and gives Dr. Holmes a hug.
Kelly realizes that Wyatt deserves to have a girl’s name if he is going to look, dress, and act like a girl. She and Wayne ask him what he’d like to be called. He comes up with several names from TV shows and settles on Nicole, the name of a character on the Nickelodeon series Zoey 101. Wayne struggles to utter the new name, so he avoids calling his child by name at all. Kelly is left to sort out the details. The family realizes that Maine law requires name changes to be announced in the newspaper. To avoid this, they’ll have to get a judge to make an exception. Pursuing this option seems necessary to protect Nicole from the ire of the right-wing religious community, especially the local Christian Civic League, which knows how to create controversy and get the media involved.
When the Maineses go to court, their family-law attorney is unable to join them and sends a real-estate lawyer instead. The proceedings begin on shaky ground, with the elderly judge asking the Maineses why they want their child’s name changed and why they want the change kept out of the paper. They explain their concerns about the Christian Civic League and the judge suggests that the league should appear in court to share what its members think. Wayne then takes the stand and does something unexpected: he says out loud that he agrees with Kelly. Wyatt should be allowed to make a full transition as safely as possible. The judge grants the request, convinced that Wayne and Kelly are concerned about their child’s safety. The parents are relieved and somewhat surprised. The day also marks Wayne’s first time showing public support for Nicole being transgender.
In Chapters 14 and 15, Nutt shifts from telling the Maineses’ story to probing scientific information about sex, gender, and human development. This strategy accomplishes several things. First, it lends authority to Nutt’s voice as she launches into discussions about endocrinology, hormone therapy, and sex reassignment surgery in the chapters that follow. It also addresses doubts readers might have about the existence of gender dysphoria and transgender identity. By presenting important scientific evidence and explaining the questions researchers have aimed to address in studies about the relationship between sex and gender, Nutt makes a strong case that sexual anatomy and gender identity come from distinct processes and can contradict each other if any number of biological phenomena disrupt or alter these processes. Even if this argument doesn’t convince the reader who doubts whether people can really be transgender, it presents enough provocative questions to keep the pages turning.
When Nutt returns to her narrative about the Maines family, she makes the dramatic arc soar. The family decides to explore sex reassignment surgery, which is dramatic in and of itself. We learn that Nicole could become one of the first American patients at one of the first gender clinics for kids. And we discover that Nicole might be working with a doctor who has an inspiring story: specializing in hormone therapy for transgender kids after encountering many transgender youth who were homeless on the streets of Boston.
Chapter 18 concludes with a nail-biting courtroom scene. By presenting this part of the story—the moment when a judge gets to decide whether Nicole’s name change can be kept out of the newspapers—through the eyes of Maineses, Nutt makes the outcome feel uncertain and high-stakes to the reader. Despite being an optimist, Kelly is not feeling particularly optimistic that the judge will support what the family wants. Nutt’s focus on this doubt is likely to make the reader feel doubt as well. And Wayne’s moving speech about Nicole comes as a surprise, heightening the drama and suggesting that he may find a way to fully accept her as a transgender person after all. In other words, Wayne might redeem himself before the story is over.